The beat . A blog by premiumbeat

April 29, 2011
Royalty Free Music

What is Royalty Free Music? What does it mean exactly?

There are a lot of inaccurate ideas circulating about “Royalty Free Music” This article will attempt to explain exactly what Royalty Free Music is and dismiss some of the most common misinterpretations.

In a nutshell Royalty Free Music refers to a type of music licensing that allows the purchaser to pay for the music license only once and to use the music for as long as desired.

For example you purchase a Royalty Free Music license for a video on your website. You pay one single price whether you have 100 visitors or 10,000 visitors, and whether you use the music for 1 month or 10 years. Or you purchase a TV advertising license for your new restaurant. You pay once and the commercial can play once a week or 50 times a week, for 3 months or for 5 years. You pay once and you use it for as long as you want.

The term “Royalty Free” is confusing for more reasons than one. In fact it simply means “Free of Royalty”. The term is in opposition to “rights managed” licensing where the purchaser pays fees (royalties) according to the number of times it will be used as well as the size of the territory. With Rights Managed licensing or “Needle Drop” licensing you would need to pay a fee every time the music is used or as the old term expressed every time the “needle is dropped” on the record.

Just as importantly here is what Royalty Free Music does NOT mean…

Royalty Free Music is NOT free!
It is “Free of Royalty” not cost free. Just like a fat free cookie is “free of fat” not free of cost. Or a “tax free” product is not free, it is just free of taxes. And yes some people may be offering their music for free – whether it is also Royalty Free or not! For example a composer may be offering you his music for free for your College film in exchange for listing his work in the credits.

Royalty Free Music is NOT Stock Music
Although most Royalty Free Music comes from Stock Music Library such as they are not synonymous. A Stock Music Library is a music library that offers music already in stock – already made and ready to license and use. Although some people consider Stock Music negatively as cheap “canned music” it is not the case at all. You have the full range of music quality in stock music from very amateurish poorly mixed music to highly professional music tracks. Stock music is understood in opposition to “custom made” music that is created for a specific product – a film, a commercial, a TV show… Many stock music libraries offer their music on a Royalty Free basis, but other libraries prefer to offer their music with a Rights Managed model or “per usage” based on the frequency of use as well as the size of the territory.

Royalty Free Music is NOT Copyright Free music
I am not sure there is such a thing as “Copyright free” music since anyone who creates a piece of music automatically owns the Copyright for that music. The creator may not care and say that anyone can use his music for any purpose. In this case the Copyright owner is giving you the “right to copy” his music for any purpose. So it may be free to use but that does not make it free of Copyright. And this does not mean that the composer has given up his Performing Rights if his music ends up a background music on television for example. The composer as the Copyright owner may want to receive his composers royalties for the public performance of his music. Even the recordings of Public Domain music are not Copyright Free. The composition may be Copyright Free but not the actual sound recording (also called the Master). You can read an excellent text about Copyright and Public Domain music at

Royalty Free Music is NOT a specific type of music
It can be music in any genre from Classical to Heavy Metal to Country music. Instead it is a type of “Music Licensing” for commercial use. Commercial use here means using the music for more than your private usage (your home, your car, your iPod). Private usage is the right you get when you purchase a music CD or pay and download your music from iTunes for example. That does not provide you with any broader rights (your website, your videos, your slideshows, TV shows, etc.).

Royalty Free Music is NOT poor quality music
Any music can be licensed as Royalty Free music. The good the bad and the ugly. This choice for music licensing has strictly nothing to do with the quality of the music itself. The quality will vary enormously from one library to the other. The quality of library music has more to do with management policies, whether the music is hand-picked or not, whether composers are screened or not, etc.

Royalty Free Music is NOT cheap music
Royalty free music can licensed at any price. It is not a price structure, it is simply a licensing model. You can find Royalty Free music for $30 and you can find it for $600. It has nothing to do with pricing, it has to do with the licensing model of not charging royalties each time the music is used. This being said most of the time music licensed with a Royalty Free model is inexpensive and affordable for most people.

Royalty Free Music is NOT Royalty Free!! Say what?
Usually Royalty Free Music licensing does not include “public performance” royalties. Those are royalties paid to composers when their music is performed publicly – on television for example. But these royalties are not being paid by you (the music purchaser) they are being paid by the network that is broadcasting the show where the music is performed either as a featured piece or more commonly on television as background music. Performing Rights Organizations (PRO) like ASCAP, BMI, SESAC, SOCAN, PRS, etc. are being paid by the networks and are in charge of distributing the performing royalties to the music composers. So for the person purchasing the music license it is entirely Royalty Free but if fact some royalties may be paid to the composers by the PROs. Wikipedia mentions this as well on its Royalty Free Music page.

Why is it so confusing? Is there not a better term to describe Royalty Free Music?
The truth is that although I have yet to meet a single person in the industry who actually likes the term “Royalty Free Music”, it is the term that appears to be “sticking” at this time. Chances are in fact that you are reading this because you Googled these words.

Other expressions have been proposed by several people in the industry to describe Licensing from Music Libraries like These terms are better in many ways. But none of them are sticking for now. Here are few expressions that have been proposed to replace the confusing “Royalty Free Music”:

  • Pre-Licensed Stock Music
  • Pre-Licensed Production Music
  • Pre-Licensed Music Library
  • One-Stop Stock Music library
  • One-Stop Music Shop
  • Single Fee Stock Music
  • Single Fee Music Licensing
  • Single Fee Production Music
  • Pre-Paid Production Music

So should we call it One-Stop Pre-Paid Production Music Shop Licensing Library?

I guess for now we’ll stay with Royalty Free Music.

Gilles Arbour

Need Music for your Video Projects?

Browse our Exclusive Music Library

Related Posts:

  • Neha

    Just had to post to thank you for this comprehensive list of sources for royalty free music. I’ve not been great about making sure I had the proper rights for projects I’ve done for personal use. I recently got a project that will be used publicly and was at a loss of where to start. This is a huge time saver for me.

  • John Bickerton

    nice article – however it’s very similar to the one I wrote in 2008 from its overall form to its content – right down to the One-Stop Music Library part – best form of flattery? I don’t know… (did you think I wouldn’t see it?)

    • Gilles

      Hi John – actually I did not see your article. Or maybe I did back in 2008 and I don’t remember it. But please leave a link to your article here so we can all read it and learn more. I heard the expression One-Stop Shop or one-stop Music library from our attorney in 2005. It seemed to be a common term to describe the type of library where one can license both the Composition and Master. He actually wrote an article about this here:

  • http://YourSite(Optional) -

    Interesting article. I agree, I don’t think many people in the industry do like the term royalty free as it’s misleading. Browse our royalty free catalogue doesnt quite help to move away from this term. Perhaps it helps drive traffic to sites too

  • Ashley

    I have this same issue… I work for Narrator Tracks (offering royalty free and buyout music) and are unsure of the proper term that should be used. Great article!

  • Gilles Arbour

    I have discussed this with other Music Library owners and we are caught between using new and different expressions or sticking with Royalty Free Music. It is remarkable to see that our clients are actually searching for the terms “royalty free music” and of course we want them to find us. In spite of its weaknesses it has clearly become the accepted term. So we’ll go with the flow for now.

  • Dremagon

    Thanks! This was really helpful! I’ve been trying to make sure that I could use “royalty free” music I’m going to buy in a video I’m making and not get kicked of off YouTube or be unable to sell my work because of it. “Royalty Free” leaves a lot of open ways to interpret the phrase which can be confusing to people who are trying figure out all the legal copyright issues surrounding everything. I like the “pre-Licensed” term you listed. It makes more sense to me, but unfortunately “Royalty Free” is what everybody uses so that’s what we’ve got to stick with for now.

  • Vincent Hauser

    Thanks! Questions remain though – If I already have the CD with a song I’d like to use (commercially) – is my purchase of the CD considered to be my one time fee? Or will I still have to contact… whoever and ask for permission?

    Anyway – you cleared some things up! Thank you.

  • John Weber

    Check this out, they explain the topic pretty well too.

    Why do I have the feeling that mr gilles is trying to rank for google with his article? lol. so many times repeating the same words.

  • a

    You advertised a lot, were you paid for that or do you work for them. Am I allowed to ask?

  • Lino Rise

    Here´s a great source with royalty free music WITHOUT any cost.

    Royalty Free is realy not that easy to understand. I do like your artikel Gilles Arbour! It explains a lot about this sensitive licence structure.

    Well done!

  • Coolyken

    This is a very confusing subject to the laymen. I make YouTube videos and have used music that is included with my editing software. I had to prove to YouTube that I can use this music because part of the purchase price of the software goes to the publishers of the music.
    Recently I purchased a license to use background music for a new video. YouTube would not monetize the video and stated that the publisher of the has made a claim but will share any revenues I gain on a pro-rata basis. What was the license fee for?
    Very confusing!

  • frankie09

    usually sometimes using music by unsigned artists that
    usually an function on youtube’s video editing management
    to get around the third party matched content that can lead
    to strikes and account suspension sanctioned by top leading
    recording studios suspensions can last up to six months or
    leading to an termination due to any occurring violations thats
    why they use royalty free music but can be misguided at times.
    Frankie Smales

  • DG_76

    I heard that in most cases even though you are paying for pre-paid production music and have to pay royalties to the creator, it isn’t as much if you don’t purchase it at all. I have also heard in some cases where if your prepaid licencing gets questioned some companies will fight to make sure you keep the revenue if that license is played on television or profitable youtube channels.

  • Kate

    I’m hoping to start up my own exercise class and have purchased all my songs legally from ITunes onto my iPhone, can I use this music or do I need a license/permission?

  • mkultraisreal

    link broken

Become a better editor!