5 Shopping Cart
Your cart has been updated

Cover image via

Why Hindenburg Is the Best Podcast Editing Software

For an intuitive experience try Hindenburg Journalist, the audio editing software built for radio and used by podcasters around the world.

Picking the right hardware and podcasting equipment makes a huge difference in audio quality, and first-time listeners might be turned off by bad audio. Sure, microphones, headphones, and mixers are necessary for a podcast, but there’s more to podcasting than hardware. Software, such as a digital audio workstation (DAW) or podcast editor, is where you will shape your audio into a finished, polished product your audience can enjoy.

Picking the right podcast recording software can make your experience more comfortable. So, which one is right for you? In my opinion, the best podcasting software is one that you’ve probably never heard of. Hindenburg Journalist is a recording software made for broadcast radio, which also makes it perfect for podcasters.

Is Hindenburg a Digital Audio Workstation?

Technically, yes. Hindenburg is a DAW, but there are significant differences between other DAWs and Hindenburg. For the most part, popular DAWs focus on music production or mixing and mastering. Hindenburg Journalist is the opposite of that. Incidentally, we’ve compiled a comprehensive list of different DAWs and podcast solutions already, if you want the whole picture. In the end, I found that Hindenburg’s workflow is lean, streamlined, and intuitive — they’ve trimmed all the fat and left only the good parts. Hindenburg is a DAW, in essence, but it’s much more straightforward to use.

Don’t get me wrong, Audacity and other DAWs have great features. They are perfectly viable for making podcasts, but using them is overkill. You wouldn’t buy a Ferrari just to go grocery shopping, so why use a complicated DAW when Hindenburg will do just fine? Also, the software costs only $95 for the Journalist version, and there are no monthly fees, such as the ones that Pro Tools and other companies charge. If you’re not convinced, just take a look at my favorite features below.

The Basics

Hindenburg does away with all of those fancy knobs, sliders, and complicated settings. The software is easy to use. You can import audio from another project, such as the audio from a voice recorder, or you can record straight into the software. To record, select the track you wish to record and hit Arm Record (to prepare the track), then hit Record (to get started). You can do almost everything with shortcuts. Learn and memorize your shortcuts to streamline your editing even more.

When you’re done recording, you can cut out the parts that don’t sound good and arrange the audio, as you prefer. When the audio is up to your standards, it’s time to export, and Hindenburg Journalist exports to most of the popular file types, such as MP3, WAV, and AAC. FLAC and OPUS are available on the Pro version. If you want, you can publish your podcast on SoundCloud or Libsyn with one click.

It may seem too simple, but that’s all there is to it. You don’t have to set your recording sample rate or mess around with the audio levels. All you have to do is record, then trim the recording to your liking. Hindenburg handles pretty much everything else.

What Makes Hindenburg the Best Podcast Software

There are a few key features that differentiate this piece of software from DAWs. Most importantly, the sound quality of my voice is much better. I recently started a podcast, and I recorded and edited my latest episode using the trial version of Hindenburg Journalist Pro. My setup is noisy. And, my microphone (the AT2020 USB) is a condenser microphone that tends to pick up even the faintest of noises (the quietest breaths make me sound like I just ran a marathon). However, after my last recording on Hindenburg Journalist Pro, my voice sounded crystal clear, and I no longer sounded like Tom Hardy‘s Bane.

The Auto Leveler

Hindenburg: Why It’s the Best Podcast Editor for Serious Podcasters — Hindenburg Pro Recording

Recording audio on Hindenburg. Image via Alejandro Medellin.

Hindenburg: Why It’s the Best Podcast Editor for Serious Podcasters — Hindenburg Auto-Leveler

After the recording is finished, the auto-leveler immediately adjusts the audio, bringing the clip up or down. Image via Alejandro Medellin.

Before, when I used Audacity or other DAWs, the audio from the microphone picked up my breathing, the noise coming from my computer’s fans, and the air conditioning. But, Hindenburg Journalist immediately adjusts the audio’s levels as soon as the recording is finished. The audio imported into the software also gets the same treatment.

In my previous episode, I recorded the podcast on Audacity. I trimmed it down and put it through Auphonic — a podcasting service that uses an algorithm to adjust sound levels — but that wasn’t necessary this time around. The raw audio recorded on Hindenburg, before any manual adjustments, sounded great to me. I didn’t have to tweak levels any further. The auto leveler does such a fantastic job that my podcast sounded like it was recorded inside a soundproof studio.

Clip Handles

Hindenburg: Why It’s the Best Podcast Editor for Serious Podcasters — Hindenburg Pro Clip Handles

The highlighted yellow portion has various fade-in and fade-out points to create audio bedding. Image via Alejandro Medellin.

The second thing I appreciate about this software is how easy it is to use and, most importantly, how uncomplicated it is to deal with clips. Clicking on the handles on a clip manipulates it in different ways. If you click on one of the corners with your mouse, you can drag it inward to create a fade-in or fade-out effect. On Audacity, fading in or out involved diving into the settings. Also, you can click on the top of the clip and drag it up or down to adjust sound levels. If the auto-leveler isn’t to your liking, feel free to adjust it manually.


The clipboard is another feature I haven’t seen in other DAWs. Basically, you can move a clip into the clipboard to use for later. The clipboard is especially useful when editing together an interview where you want to add narration in-between clips, for example. Having conducted and edited interviews before, I can tell you first-hand how frustrating that experience can be when editing. Essentially, you want to pick the best sound bites and arrange them in a way that tells a story. However, where you place those soundbites as you rearrange the timeline can quickly turn into a mess. Instead, Hindenburg has four clipboard groups that store your clips so you can drop them into the timeline wherever you please. You can also name each of these boards individually for better organization. You may not think you need this, but it’ll prove useful.

Play Selected

Hindenburg: Why It’s the Best Podcast Editor for Serious Podcasters — Hindenburg Play Selected

An example of a selected portion of the audio. Notice that the chosen section begins at the green bar and ends at the red one. Image via Alejandro Medellin.

Within Hindenburg Journalist, playback is mostly similar to DAWs. You still have buttons such as play, pause, stop, forward, backward, and others. One of the features that I use the most is “Play Selection” (the shortcut is shift+space bar), which plays only the selected audio. In Hindenburg Journalist, you click your mouse over any part of the timeline and move it forward or backward to select the desired section of audio. The chosen audio starts at the green bar and ends at the red bar. By using shift+space bar, you can listen to only the selected audio, which I use all the time to inspect clips. You can adjust the selected audio by clicking the green or red bar and moving it. When moving a clip into the clipboard, this feature can make sure you only select the audio you need, and nothing more.

Rehearse Clip

Hindenburg offers a similar feature called “Rehearse Clip” (control+shift+space bar). It works by playing the audio a few seconds before the selected audio and skipping it to start again where the selected audio ends. So, if you want to delete a portion of the audio, all you have to do is select it, then use this feature to hear how the track will sound once you remove that specific bit of audio. It’s genius is what it is. I never knew how much I needed this until I tried it, and now I can’t go back. I can’t say for sure that other DAWs don’t have it, but I’ve never seen it.

There are tons of other features I wish I had the room to write about, but these were my favorites. For such a simple-looking software, there are an absurd amount of features available in just the basic version of Hindenburg. Hindenburg Journalist Pro does have slightly more features, but it may not be worth it for most. It depends on the podcast and the person producing it. All I can do is give you the information you need to make your decision.

Do You Need the Pro Version?

The short answer is no. The long answer is also no, but there are some caveats, so I’ll just get to it. The Pro version comes with all the features from the Journalist version, but it does have one feature that may be essential for some podcasters — multi-track recording. Multi-track recording is useful for two main reasons: to record multiple people, at the same time, in one location via several microphones, or to record a long-distance podcast with several people via Skype or Zoom. Either way, being able to record on multiple tracks makes editing more manageable, since you can adjust each track instead of all the tracks at once.

The Long-Distance Podcasting Problem

When it comes to long-distance recording, things can quickly get complicated. See, recording sound that passes through your computer is easy with Hindenburg. You can do it by simply setting the input source to “other applications” instead of your microphone. The problem, however, is that when you set up a Skype or Zoom call with your guests, Hindenburg Journalist will only record the incoming audio since it can only record one track at a time. This leaves you with only one side of the conversation. To remedy this, you could use software to route all audio into one track, but then you’re left with only one track for all the voices on the podcast which isn’t ideal for editing.

If you plan on hosting a long-distance podcast, you may want to buy Hindenburg Pro. On the other hand, the $375 price tag is much higher than even Logic Pro X or Pro Tools, so it’s worth thinking over. You could use Hindenburg Journalist for editing and something like Zencastr (a long-distance podcast recording service) to record your audio. However, those monthly Zencastr fees would eventually catch up to the cost of Hindenburg Journalist Pro. In all fairness, I’m not saying Hindenburg Journalist Pro is a bad purchase. But you shouldn’t spend $375 on a podcast software, especially when you’re just starting, which is why I don’t recommend buying it.

It’s Good but Not Worth the Money

Hindenburg: Why It’s the Best Podcast Editor for Serious Podcasters — Hindenburg Play Comparison

Just a few of the comparisons between Hindenburg Journalist and Journalist Pro. Disregard other versions. Image via Hindenburg.

Of course, Hindenburg Pro has more features than just multi-track recording, such as noise reduction, voice profiler pro, loudness normalization, and others. I’m not saying these features aren’t useful, but you’ll probably be fine without them. Speaking from experience, the auto leveler built into Hindenburg Journalist is good enough that my noisy recording setup ended up sounding quiet and professional, but that may differ for others. As mentioned before, I downloaded the trial version of Hindenburg Journalist Pro, but I didn’t use any of the advanced features.

Use Hindenburg Journalist and Start Podcasting

To become a great podcaster, you have to begin somewhere. Plug your microphone in — it doesn’t have to be fancy — and talk about a topic you’re passionate about. If you and a friend or family member share the same passion, just record your conversation, and choose a good podcast editor that you trust and is easy to use. Trim your podcast down, remove some of the “ums,” adjust your sound levels, and maybe add an intro song. I would be remiss if I didn’t mention that PremiumBeat has a vast library of royalty-free music that’d go great with your podcast. That’s where I got my intro song, and I love it! To recap, start your podcast and trust in a good podcast editor such as Hindenburg Journalist.

Alternative Options: Dedicated Digital Audio Workstations

I know I just finished lauding Hindenburg Journalist with many praises, but just because it’s my recommendation doesn’t mean you need it to make a great podcast. I started out using Audacity, and it’s been my audio editor-of-choice for many years. It’s completely free to use and download, and there are tons of online tutorials and YouTube videos so it’s easy to learn. What I love about Audacity is that it can run on almost any machine across Windows, macOS, and even certain Linux distributions, and it’s so versatile for such a lightweight software. Though it may look dated, Audacity is a practical first choice if you want to learn the basics of audio editing. You can always carry that information over to a new piece of software when you decide it’s time for an upgrade.

Another DAW that’s good for making podcasts is Adobe Audition, which is part of Adobe’s Creative Cloud. In regards to making podcasts, Audition has a podcast voice preset that slightly changes the sound of your voice, giving it that podcast quality sound you want. It also has multi-track recording and tons of other features useful for podcast production. The Adobe suite is popular, leading to an abundance of online tutorials and videos. One thing you should consider though is the price, which is $20.99/month. If you have the money and are already familiar with Adobe products, Audition is a solid choice.

Cover image by radioshoot.

Want to learn more about starting and editing your podcast? Check these out.

Get 200+ Video Transitions
Add flair and style to your next cut with these 200 video transitions. Designed for Premiere Pro and FCPX.